|
|
|
Politicians Fight For Homeland Security Pork
The Rising Issue of
Homeland InsecurityBy Roy D. Follendore III Copyright (c) 2003 by RDFollendoreIII January 27, 2003 Well
we Americans sure have done a great deal to protect our security so far here in
the homeland. We have trashed our existing organizations that have
successfully protected us in the past, and because of that dropped the R&D
budgets for new technologies that might protect us. Now we have the
Democrats fighting over the pork. We can be assured that lots of deals
were cut that made sure that the money for Homeland Security went the
"right direction." That is part of the capital hill mentality.
Even disasters have their advantages for politicians. These people like to
play politics like the stock market. The time to get the goods is
when the prices are low. No wonder Homeland Security was the only thing
that the Democrats and the Republicans can agree upon. That is funny since
they could not even agree on a Federal budget. Maybe
the "first responders" in backwater counties need billions of dollars
worth of chemical, biological and nuclear warfare survival equipment. But
the truth is that they probably need most of it about as much as all of the
other junk that the Federal Government has shown fit to dump on them. (Oh
maybe a few of them might need some of it, particularly since so much
radioactive, chemical and biological residual pollution still exists from the
cold war and from EPA dumps that are ignored since they have been taken off the
Internet "to prevent terrorism." Let us also not forget about all of
those old corroding Nuclear Power plants that will inevitably fail.)
But the fact is that America long ago dismantled its Civil Defense program
because of the same simple and less exciting reasons this one will probably be
dismantled. The American budget just cannot afford to pay for a bunch of
useless junk that will be sitting around everywhere rotting. Sure
it is possible that the United States might be hit by more terrorism at sometime
in the future. It is also possible that the entire human race might be
wiped out by a plague that is created though DNA manipulation of our food
sources. Maybe even certain people should have inoculations. The point is
that there are so many quite credible doomsday scenarios that come straight from
Hollywood that we can not afford to cover every possible contingency at all
times. It is doubtful that we should, even if we could because if we did
the scale of it would mean that our country would be in the business of doing
nothing but that. That does not mean that we should do nothing. I am
also not saying that it is foolish to produce medicines for a potential demand.
I am not saying that knowledge and awareness and even equipment is not an
important thing to be prepared to deliver on demand. In fact, we can
economize by developing our national infrastructure so that they are able to
rapidly deliver disaster services on demand. Factories to deliver supplies and
organizations of teachers might teach teachers can be prepared for emergencies
and disasters. But to put this great nation of the United States on
constant war footing, distribute resources in every nook and cranny and then
sustain that over decades is beyond absurd, it is irrational. This form of
irrational thinking about mobilization seems to be the American version of the
old Mao revolution in China and it has been popular since 911. There has
been too much grand heroic centralized planning for decentralized assets without
understanding their needs and far too little rational economic rational
thinking-taking place. While
the politicians fight for leveraging pork for their states, someone needs to be
thinking about the economics and sustainability of National Security. We
need to think about what is good for America first. The Democrats are trying to
make an economic issue out of the Office of Homeland Security. We probably
should not have ever created such a monstrosity in the first place, but for
better or worse we now do. Now what we need to be paying attention to is
the fact that this creature will be far more efficient at burning billions more
of taxpayers money for useless state programs and potentially dangerous
solutions to problems that really don't exist. Otherwise the Office of
Homeland Security will become the Office of Homeland Insecurity. You
can be certain that we will be hearing that term from now on.
|
|
Copyright (c) 2001-2007 RDFollendoreIII All Rights Reserved
|